• Explore Vox
  • Culture
  • Entertainment
  • Life
  • Music
  • News & Politics
  • Technology
  • Join Vox
  • Take a Tour
  • Already a Member? Sign in
Outer Life

Outer Life

The history of today.

  • Outer Life’s Blog
  • Profile
  • Neighbors
  • Photos
  • More 
    • Audio
    • Videos
    • Books
    • Links
    • Collections

Sunny Days

  • Jul 10, 2007
  • Post a comment

    It was my first job interview in Los Angeles, way back in the Roaring ‘80’s.  As I shuffled into the interview room, before I even sat down, the recruiter fixed me with a determined stare, cleared this throat and asked, “Where are you from?”

     My mind stumbled, having expected something more along the lines of a “hello” or handshake or offer of a business card before he started on the third degree.  Thankfully I have a fall-back in mind-stumbling situations like this:  I repeated his question back to him. 

     “Where am I from?”

     “Your résumé says you live in New York and went to school in the East, but it doesn’t say where you grew up.”

     “Oh, here, in Los Angeles.”

     He smiled, leaned back and said, “You’d be amazed.  I interview all these college grads from the East and Midwest, highly-accomplished young people making major life decisions, with tons of variables to consider and weigh, and what do they want to talk about?  The weather.  It always comes down to the weather with them.  They’re not here for a job, they’re only here for sunny days.  Amazing!”

     He shook his head while he spoke, underscoring his disappointment and disdain, feelings I tried to mirror with indications of empathetic agreement, eager as I was to get the job.

     The truth is, I wasn’t amazed at all.  I had, after all, been raised by those sun seekers. 

*  *  *

     As soon as they left college, my parents fled the cold climes of their youth to bask in the Southern California sun.  Families and friends were left behind to freeze.  My parents weren’t alone.  So many flooded into the state after World War II, like moths drawn to the sunlight, that it seemed every adult I met while growing up had traded snow for sun. 

     My parents and their fellow émigrés did not pine for the old country.  Quite the opposite:  they were rabid Southern California boosters, relentlessly giddy with delight in their new promised land, never missing a chance to compare and contrast their new Golden State with the Eastern hometowns they left behind:

     “You think it’s hot outside, let me tell you, you don’t know hot until you’ve spent a summer back East.  Don’t even get me started on the bugs....”

     “You think it’s cold outside, let me tell you, you don’t know cold until you’ve spent an autumn back East.  Don’t even get me started on the winters....”

     “That’s the beauty of an earthquake, it might be bad, but only for a minute.  Back East the cold grey days of winter never seem to end, and there’s the mud season to look forward to.  Now that’s a natural disaster….”

     They lived for our 85 degree Christmas days and those ridiculously sunny Rose Parades on New Year’s.  The TV news would be showing blizzards back East, stranded travelers at airports, cities buried in snow, and they’d be on the phone, trying to get through to their frozen relatives, desperate to let them know the sun was still shining here, it’s such a shame to be inside, maybe this afternoon we’ll have barbecue out back.  And a swim, it’s a little hot today.  Oh, and by the way, how is the weather back there?

*  *  *

     My parents never returned East, not even to visit relatives.  They didn’t have to – the frozen relations they left behind were more than happy to visit us.  And our sun. 

     And we never took up any winter sports, my parents convinced that only the feeble-minded and the insane would spend good money to freeze to death.  The sun is free, they’d say.  I didn’t touch snow until I was 14 and a friend’s family took me along on a ski trip.  And I was in college before snow first fell on me. 

     So without any firsthand experience of cold, I had little choice but to believe my parents.  They must be right:  The East must be hell.  Not hell in a hot way, of course, but hell in a cold way.  Sort of the opposite of traditional depictions of hell but still real hellish, if you get where I’m going with this because I no longer do. 

     Anyways, I internalized the “Cold Bad” part of the message.  Made sense to me.  Everyone I knew hated the cold.  And how else do you explain Phoenix?  Over time the North would slowly drain South until one day we’d look up and realize there was no one left up there, other than those too old, infirm or feeble-minded to join the migration. 

     But the awkward part is I never internalized the “Heat Good” part of their message.  I am melanin-challenged, my northern European pallor barely able to withstand a weak sun peeking through thick clouds maybe once or twice a week.  Anything more and I burn.  In the days before sunscreen, growing up in the land of constant sun and cloudless days, with wanton sun worshippers for parents, I burned all the time.  Today my dermatologist calls me “The Annuity.”

     My parents believed in heat so much they never bought an air conditioned car.  We drove around for years soaked with sweat and sticking to the vinyl seats while the open car windows blasted hot air into our faces.  And our house wasn’t much better, my parents springing only for a swamp cooler, a strange device that blew air through a wet sponge-like pad, managing to keep the house a degree or two cooler than the outside while infusing our interior air with the moisture-laden malarial miasma of a swamp.  Hence the name, I guess.  Some say it’s not the heat, it’s the humidity.  With our swamp cooler, it was the heat and the humidity.

     Not that it was easy to stay inside in the days before cable TV, computers, video games or the internet.  It was universally understood in those pre-milk carton days that during the day adults stayed inside while kids vanished somewhere outside.  When the sun was up, we were out.  Whether we liked it or not.  “It’s not healthy for a 10 year old to be sitting around the house all day,” my mom would say, pushing me out the door and into the smog-filled radiation-drenched frying pan we called the front yard, ordering me not to return until the street lights went on. 

     We rode our bikes everywhere.  Had to, the role of “parent chauffeur” not yet written.  I remember riding to a friend’s house on one of those triple-digit days, the sun burning my sunscreen-less skin and blinding my sunglass-less eyes, huffing and puffing as I struggled up his hill, my prematurely-browned lungs struggling to separate the oxygen from the smog, till I blacked out and came to in the gutter with a pounding headache and scrapes up and down my left side.  Just a mild case of sunstroke, not to worry, they said.  Memories of that ride, and the other Bataan death rides of my youth, are still seared in my mind.

     My favorite destination was the public library, the only air-conditioned building within biking distance that encouraged loitering and didn’t require me to buy anything.  Sometimes I think my love of reading is just a byproduct of my childhood need to beat the heat.

*  *  *

     College offered my first chance of escape.  By then I was ready to test the Cold Bad idea in person.  As applications from schools in the Northeast started filling our mailbox, my parents were puzzled.  How could he even think of leaving the sun, they wondered.  Maybe he isn’t as smart as we thought. 

     I applied to a few California schools, but in the end I chose a college in the frozen East, as I knew all along I would.  I didn’t choose it for the cold, of course.  I chose it for a reason far more relevant to my higher education prospects:  how to put the most distance between me and my parents. 

     My parents and their émigré friends assured me I wouldn’t be able to handle the cold.  Everyone knew someone whose idiot kid left California for the East only to high-tail it back after the first frost, tail between his legs, vowing never again to forsake the warmth of the sun.  Intelligent, highly-educated people would tell me, as a biological fact, that my blood was simply too thin to withstand a real winter.  They assured me I’d be back.

     And once I arrived at college, I began to think they might be right.  Where were all the Californians?  My school proudly proclaimed in its glossy admissions brochure that it drew students from every state – that explained the dork from Wyoming – so I naturally assumed that the most populous state in the nation would be better represented at my school than, say, Rhode Island, but it wasn’t.  Maybe, I thought, I was the only Californian stupid enough to leave. 

     I wasn’t the only one, but we Californians were such a novelty that each of us was known as “The Californian,” as in “Were you at The Pit last night?  Did you see that guy break the pitcher while trying to break-dance on the bar?  The one who’d lost his pants?  Well, later we saw him on the sidewalk passed out in a pool of his own vomit.  Who was he?  I don’t remember his name, but you know, he’s The Californian.”

     In psychology there’s a useful concept called “social proof,” the primal sense of comfort we get when mindlessly moving along with the herd.  One week at college and I realized I’d left my herd behind for a primal sense of discomfort.  And I hadn’t even experienced the cold yet.  I kept thinking of those idiot California kids who didn’t make it through the first frost.  Maybe my parents were right.

     It didn’t help that my classmates were amazed that anyone would voluntarily leave California for this place.  They sounded disturbingly like the children my parents should have had, what with their longing to flee the cold and dreary East to bask in the blinding glare of Southern California’s fabled perma-sun.  Surely these were the kids who, just a few years later, could speak only of sunny days at Los Angeles job interviews.

     My classmates had these naive notions about Californians, based mostly on Beach Boys songs and those “I Love Lucy” episodes when she visited a Hollywood so stuffed with celebrities she couldn’t throw a rock without hitting one.  So everyone assumed I surfed with celebrities.  I didn’t, on both counts, but years of bike rides in the searing desert heat had browned my skin enough so that, while a Californian would see my library-bleached skin and assume I was either terminally ill or a vampire, next to these pasty white Easterners I could pass for a Laird Hamilton.  Or even a George Hamilton.

     The point was, there is this thing called the California Dream.  There is not this thing called the Rhode Island Dream, or the Pennsylvania Dream, or the New Jersey Dream.  The New Jersey Nightmare, maybe, but never the New Jersey Dream.  And for some perverse and unfathomable reason I was born into the Dream, but turned my back and fled from it.  What was wrong with me?

*  *  *

     After all this the cold, when it finally hit, was anti-climactic.  I’d prepared by ordering enough gear from L.L. Bean to outfit an arctic expedition, so if anything it was never cold enough for me.  It’d be a breezy 20 degrees and I’d be sweating in my thermal underwear and flannel-lined trousers and down parka rated to 30 below.  I quickly learned to shed these layers, eventually getting by on all but the coldest days with regular jeans and a thin cotton field coat.  Maybe my blood thickened.  Maybe it was an early flash of global warming.  Or maybe my parents’ cold was much colder than the real cold. 

     When the first snow hit, I walked about entranced, marveling at the quiet beauty of the white blanket.  It was love at first sight.  My father said my love affair would end the day I had to shovel my own driveway, but that didn’t faze me at all, and not just because I was a feckless student without a heating bill to pay, or because the snow was forbidden fruit denied to me for so many years, or because loving the snow was a tangible manifestation of my late adolescent need to repudiate my parents, nor even because I somehow anticipated the day when homeowners of even modest means could afford their own gas-powered self-propelled snow blowers.  No, I simply loved the snow, and still do, for basic reasons I have a hard time explaining, except to note that my ancestors must have felt it too.  Why else would they have walked out of sunny Africa 30,000 years ago, not stopping until they reached the frozen north?

     I loved the seasons.  Not any particular season, just the fact that there are seasons.  Where I grew up, they had this outdoor thermostat they’d set at 78 half the year, 72 the other half.  Yawn.  Back East there was always something happening outside, nature was always asserting itself somehow.  It added a degree of interest to my days.

     It wasn’t all perfect, of course.  I had a hard time adjusting to the rain.  I owned the proper rain gear, but a lifetime living in a land where it’s bone dry nearly all the time left me incapable of comprehending that a sunny morning could turn into a soaking afternoon.  How many times did I leave the rain gear in my room only to return that afternoon soaked to the skin?  Enough that over the years I got wetter than my rain gear.

     And I never made my peace with forced-air heating systems, those arid blasts of hot air reminiscent of the arid desert land I’d fled.  At night I’d either turn off the heat or open a window, sometimes waking to snow drifts on my bed and always finding it that much harder to leave the warmth under the covers, the last thing a late riser with morning classes needed, and a direct cause, I maintain, of some of my lowest grades.

*  *  *

     And with those grades I nearly flunked out of college.  I managed to graduate, but without a job.  I moved to New York, figuring in a city of eight million jobs, one or two would fall between the cracks for me to find, and sure enough, after a some desperate months of searching, I managed to find the only job as pathetic as me, a job every other recent college graduate must have already turned down, the sort of job they gladly shipped to Bangalore as soon as it opened for business a few years later.

     The job was, alas, more pathetic than me.  In between hundreds of telemarketing calls to fast food restaurant managers – my job requiring me to shill food service industry trade publications to the functionally illiterate – I desperately searched for a way out.  After ruling out homelessness, a life of crime and suicide, I realized I had to find another job.  Any job.  Doing anything.  Anywhere. 

     Which led me back to Los Angeles, where my parents knew someone who knew someone who knew of a ground floor opportunity available to anyone who could get through an interview without mentioning sunny days, something I managed to do without even trying, being perhaps the only person to ever move to Los Angeles despite, not because of, the weather. 

     Twenty years later, I’m still here.  Amazing.

Post a comment

The Gloaming

  • Jun 14, 2007
  • Post a comment

    Day’s turning to night as my daughter and I stroll in silence, our conversation having receded with the setting sun, the only sound now the waves crashing just below our feet, wet sand between our toes, lost in our own thoughts.

     I look up from the water as the stars start to poke out and immediately my mind flashes back to something I heard a long time ago – was it Carl Sagan? – along the lines that there are more stars in the universe than grains of sand on all the beaches on earth.

     Looking down at the sand, trying to imagine the number that would account for each grain, or each star, my mind hits a wall.  I can start by counting a square millimeter of sand, extrapolate that over a meter, then over a kilometer, then estimating the total size of beaches in the world, and extrapolating my sand-per-kilometer over that, and after all this I may derive a number that’s reasonably close, but what’s the point?  I can stare at those zeroes the rest of my life and never really comprehend them.  My puny little mind in my puny little body on my puny little planet rotating around a puny little star in a puny little galaxy simply is simply not equipped to even imagine something so far from anything any human has ever experienced.  Can an amoeba comprehend an ant?  Can an ant comprehend me?  The universe is too big, and we are too small.

     I remember last year, when we worked on her science project, we figured out that if Earth was the size of an orange, the Sun would be the size of a hot air balloon.  As if that wasn’t incredible enough, if we separated these props so they matched, in scale, the distance between them in our solar system, we’d have to place the orange-sized earth a football field away from the Sun.  And Pluto, back then still a planet, would be a little olive orbiting our Sun from 2.5 miles away.  Unbelievable.

     At the time, I was going to drive the point home to her with the stars as grains of sand analogy, but I thought better of it.  Let her try to process the solar system first.  Her nine year-old mind had been stretched quite enough for one day.  A year later, I still haven’t gotten around to sharing it with her.  Forgot about it, actually.

     Probably because lately my mind’s been retreating from the vastness of the universe without to the vastness of the universe within.  I’m studying the cell, a wondrously tiny thing.  So tiny you can fit about 200 human cells in the period at the end of this sentence.  Each cell is a self-contained factory synthesizing proteins, repelling invaders and multiplying, faithfully replicating a vast amount of information each time it splits.  How much information?  The DNA in one human cell contains 46 chromosomes, or about 30,000 genes, made up of about 3.2 billion base pairs.  If expressed in book form, each human cell contains enough information to fill more than 3,500 books, each with 300 pages and each page with 3,000 characters.  If you read one of these books a day, it would take you over nine years to read them all. 

     And all this information is tightly packed into a cell nucleus only about 0.0002 inches in diameter.  It would take 5,000 of them in a line to make one inch.  And as if that wasn’t tight enough, the cell nucleus manages to compress this information even further each time it divides.

     If you unpacked the string of DNA in one human cell and straightened it out, you’d have a line about six feet long.  If you unpacked all the DNA strands in the 100 trillion or cells in your body, you’d end up with a line that extended from the Earth to the Sun, and back, about 610 times.  All in one human body.

     As if this wasn’t head-spinning enough, I was just reading a speech the other day in which the speaker held his arms straight out, forming a cross with his body, and said that if his arm span represented the history of life on Earth, bacteria would, alone, occupy all the distance from his left finger tips to somewhere between his right shoulder and right elbow.  Animal life wouldn’t start until we reached his right elbow and dinosaurs would rise at his right palm and die out at his last finger joint. And humans?  Humans wouldn’t even appear until somewhere near the end of his last finger nail, maybe a finger nail clipping if his nails aren’t too long, with all of recorded human history occupying about one speck of dust on the edge of that finger nail. 

     So between the vastness of these two universes, the star-filled one outside and the molecular one inside, living a lifespan that amounts to less than a may fly’s on our scale, where does that leave us? 

     It’s getting cold, I notice, cold enough to yank my mind out of itself and back into the here and now.  It’s completely dark too.  I stop walking, and she starts, the break in my walking breaking her own reverie.  I suggest we turn around. 

     Walking back, our pace quickens, worried that Mom will worry.  We remain silent as our different-sized legs calibrate a new common walking rhythm.  Once they find it, and settle in, I feel her cold little hand find mine, and I squeeze it, gently but firmly, not wanting to let it go.

     “Your hands are always so warm,” she says, then, before I can say anything, she asks:  “Daddy, are there more stars in the sky or grains of sand on the beach?”

Post a comment

Random Election

  • Jun 2, 2007
  • Post a comment

     I like to think I’m entitled to entertain one completely irrational thought each day.

     What if, instead of electing politicians, we used a random lottery to draft ordinary citizens to serve in every elected office? 

     It would be just like jury service.  The letter would arrive in the mail, you’d be summoned to the Capitol on January 2 to serve as Senator or President or whatever, no excuses accepted.  If you threw out the summons hoping that meant you didn’t have to show up, the next day the Marshals would be knocking on your door to tell you otherwise.

     You’d have to serve a one year term.  And once chosen, you could never be chosen again.  After your one year term, your political career would be over forever.

     They’d pay your travel expenses, put you up in a room in D.C., and match whatever you earned the year before.  This way the job wouldn’t be an economic burden or a bonus.  Your employer would have to keep your job open for your return. 

     The bribery laws would, for once, be strictly enforced.  Any attempt by anyone to give you any money, take you on any junkets or pay your idiot brother-in-law $40 an hour to count pigeons would be punished with the stiffest sentences, them for offering, you for accepting.  As with statutory rape, it’d be strict liability, no defenses. 

     You wouldn’t be running for anything, so you wouldn’t waste any time campaigning or fundraising.  All your working time could be spent doing the job you were randomly selected to do.

     Political parties could still exist, but with no funds to divvy and no elections to organize and no constituents to court and no districts to gerrymander, all they’d have left to offer is their ideas.  They’re doomed.

     You’re thinking there’s no way this could work, ordinary citizens don’t have the necessary training to serve as Senators or Presidents or whatever.  Since when has that stopped anyone from running for office?  Or winning? 

     But random lotteries would inevitably select some idiots.  Evil people too, people with drinking problems, even people with bad teeth.  How can we allow that to happen? 

     Haven’t we already allowed that to happen?  Sure, our electoral system manages to weed out those with bad teeth, but does anyone think it’s done anything to weed out evil drunken idiots? 

     If anything, our electoral system is designed to attract these people.  People who want to rule other people are usually not the nicest people.  They’re often deformed, deranged and defective people. 

     People who crave this power, who are willing to shake the many thousands of hands and spend the many millions of dollars it takes to win, are, by definition, the most mega-megalomaniac of them all.  The most deformed, deranged and defective.  And often the most richest.

     So under the current system, we pretty much cede the field to a tiny but particularly virulent segment of our population.  Under the lottery system, we’ll instead get a random, but representative, sample of our entire population.  Us that is, a group that’ll surely include some evil drunken idiotic megalomaniacs, maybe even some with bad teeth, but will also include plenty of the meek, the selfish, the rich, the poor, the mild, the thoughtful, the nice, the assholes, the diligent, the lazy, the reliable, the schlubs, the ditsy and the wasted.  All types.

     In other words, it’ll really put the representation back into representative democracy.  Our randomly-selected representatives won’t have to answer to the people, but that shouldn’t be much of a problem because they’ll be the people. 

     With a bunch of newbies cycling through the offices each year, perhaps the bureaucrats would take over.  Then again, perhaps they already have.

     I can see you shaking your head by now, wondering when I cracked, my mind is a horrible thing to waste and all that, but I have to say I’m having a hard time coming up with anything better.  There’s always apathy, I suppose, but that’s just passive acquiescence, and the thought of accepting the same old shit every November for the rest of my life is simply too depressing.  There’s libertarianism, but my problem isn’t with government, it’s with those who govern.  And even with a cracked mind I can still see libertarianism for the dream it is and the nightmare it would be.

     So all I’m left with is the lottery idea.

     And maybe I’m still entitled to a completely irrational thought today.

Post a comment

Zig Zig

  • May 17, 2007
  • Post a comment

    I have this contrarian streak.  Unlike most contrarians, who say that proudly, I say it as a confession because my contrarianism is a sign of weakness, not strength. 

     When everyone zigs, I instinctively zag, not so much because I pride myself on walking my own path, but because I’m afflicted with the ability to feel both insecure and too secure at the same time.  My insecure side assumes I’m already too late to get in on the action, surely others are doing whatever it is much better than I can, no point in even trying, just wish I’d thought of it first, while my over secure side assumes I know better than the masses, my way must be superior for I am unique and special, not just another face in the crowd.

     So I don’t trust my contrarianism, but it’s still a struggle for me to zig when you zig.  This has kept me from walking a lot of sensible paths in my life, their sensibility obvious at the time to anyone who could see with unclouded eyes that everyone else was walking them too.  Sure, sometimes people are lemmings, and in those rare instances it doesn’t pay to follow them off a cliff, but most of the time most of the people get it mostly right.  This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.  We humans are, after all, massively more alike than different.  If what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, why isn’t it just as good for all the other geese and ganders? 

     I’m so smart, it took me only 40 years to realize this.  And still I resist!

     Example:  A few months ago my wife was worried.  All the kids were taking piano lessons except ours.  This of course meant to her that our kids must, therefore, take piano lessons too and to me that they must, therefore, not. 

     My insecure side worried my kids had already fallen too far behind as I imagined their early-adopting friends effortlessly playing rings around them at recital after recital. 

     My oversecure side figured there must be something wrong with the piano if everyone is playing it, it’s too common for my special and unique children, so maybe instead my son should study the kalimba and my daughter the torch song and someday one of those kids pounding away at piano lessons will be lucky to earn the honor of accompanying my children’s performance, the piano discretely tucked away at the back of the stage far from the spotlights with the mike turned way down so as not to distract from my little star attractions. 

     But when I resisted, she said our kids were falling behind.  Falling behind what?  The College Quest, of course.  The goal of parenting used to be simple:  raise happy, healthy, well-adjusted laborers for your farm.  Now it’s even simpler:  just get them into the Right College. 

     Parents playing the College Quest leave nothing unscheduled or unstructured.  Childhood can wait for adulthood, they seem to think, as they shuttle junior off to another enrichment class, complain he doesn’t get enough homework, sign him up for double sessions at Kumon, secretly hire a private tutor on the side, suit him up for at least one sport chosen from a list of Common College Varsity Sports No One Plays So Even the Mediocre Can Get a Scholarship or at Least Earn Some Extra Admissions Points, and, of course, carefully concoct a community service project demonstrating junior’s dedication to the underprivileged, those pathetic losers with parents who didn’t care enough to coach them in the College Quest.

     I understand that most people my kids are likely to run into in life will have played or be playing the College Quest, and therefore most people will judge my kids by their success in the College Quest, so if my kids don’t play the College Quest because their contrarian dad refused to let them, even if he was right to do so, it will hurt them later.  But, being a contrarian, I must reject the College Quest and all its insidious manifestations, including mandatory piano lessons. 

     I spend a lot of time thinking of ways around the College Quest.  If we were independently wealthy, it wouldn’t matter.  If my kids were freakishly talented at something remunerable, such as throwing an unhittable slider, it wouldn’t matter.  If we owned a cushy family business they could join, it wouldn’t matter.  If they wanted to pursue a career in fast food or farm labor, it wouldn’t matter. 

     While I was mulling this over, my kids started taking piano lessons.  They took to the piano like, well, kids who really like piano.  It’s as if they were born to play.  We couldn’t pry them away.  They spent all their free time playing.  They’d eat and sleep at the piano if we left them.  And even when they were eating at the table, they’d be fingering the songs they’d play when they were done. 

     And they were good, at least to my ear and the piano teacher’s ear, neither ear unbiased, of course.  Not that I was comparing them to other competitors in the College Quest, no, nothing as prosaic as that.  This is about sheer unadulterated joy, not a line on a college application.

     After a couple of months of undiminished enthusiasm and unchecked progress, we bought a grand piano.

     Grand pianos are very expensive.  So expensive I justified the purchase in part by telling myself I would learn to play, so if my kids ever dump the piano for a new enthusiasm, at least someone in the house would still be playing the damn thing.

     So, one morning soon after, when I was alone in the house, I sidled over to said piano, opened their Alfred’s Lesson Book 1B, found middle C and started to play.   

     After a minute or two I noticed the clock bonging noon in the hallway.  Two hours had passed.  I spent another few minutes playing until it got dark and everyone came home and I had to clean up for dinner.  At the table I caught myself fingering the songs I’d just been working on. 

     It’s been a month and my interest has only deepened.  I’m scratching an itch I never knew I had.  I bought every piano lesson book I could find.  I love learning new techniques.  I love learning new songs.  I love playing old songs, and replaying them, and replaying them some more.  I can’t seem to get enough of any of it.  It’s as if the piano emits an invisible, odorless and highly addictive gas each time I depress a key.  No wonder everyone plays it, there’s a reason it’s so common. 

     The piano follows me everywhere.  When I’m not fingering pieces on my desk, I’m playing them on my mental keyboard.  I no longer listen to music; I deconstruct it, trying to figure out how I’d play it on the piano. 

     I think I’m good, though I’m probably not, but part of the fun is to assume I’m a prodigy, albeit one who got a late late start and still has so much to learn.  This gives me the confidence to tackle any piece, to push on even as I flail around, for I have this gift that can no longer be contained.  I cannot give up.

     A more plausible explanation is that a lifetime of touch typing at 80+ wpm was, in fact, a lifetime of practice for piano, my fingers conditioned over the years into finely-toned key striking machines, able to touch type any tune, only now with a dash of con molto sentimento thrown in as needed.

     I sometimes wonder what would’ve happened if my parents had introduced me to the piano when I was a kid.  Would it have consumed me then, as it consumes me now?  Would it have led me to a different path through life?  And as my kids continue to immerse themselves deeper and deeper into everything piano, I can’t help but think that none of this would’ve happened if we’d heeded my contrarian instincts. 

     Thankfully, no one listens to me.

Post a comment

The Commute From Hell

  • Apr 26, 2007
  • Post a comment

     My commute sucks.  In a good week, I spend eight hours behind the wheel driving to and from work.  In a bad week I can spend as much as 15 hours riding the brakes while staring at the bumper in front of me. 

     At the office, I never complain about my commute.  Partly that’s because I’m the strong silent type, but mostly it’s because my colleagues do my bellyaching for me.  They never tire of poking their heads in my office and, in voices oozing pity and concern, asking me how I’m handling my commute from hell.

     I always tell them it’s fine, no big deal, but they don’t believe me.  They know it sucks.  They know I know it sucks.  They even know I won’t admit it sucks.  So why do they ask?  My misery makes them feel better about their own lousy commutes, knowing I have it worse. 

     It’s a public service I’m happy to provide, what with the relief I feel at night with each mile I put between me and the office, easing the tension and cleansing my mind of the day’s pollution, until driving up my driveway I peer down from my perch high on the hill and remind myself, surveying the city lights flickering far off in the distance in an abstract pointillistic landscape of unreality, that I am, indeed, here and not there.

     For some reason, they never ask why I chose this commute from hell.  Perhaps they know.

Post a comment

The Sunny King

  • Apr 23, 2007
  • Post a comment

    Some look at the glass and see it as half full.  Others see it as half empty.  He looks at the glass and sees it completely full.  Even if it’s really only half full.  Or half empty, depending on how you look at it.

     He’s not an optimist, though.  To be an optimist, you must first be cognizant, at some level, that things can go wrong.  It’s your persistent belief that everything will be okay, in the face of your dark knowledge, that makes you an optimist.  If instead you believe things will turn out alright because you have no idea that things could go wrong, you’re not an optimist.  You’re just stupid.

     But he’s not stupid.  He’s actually very bright.  A real achiever, a leader of men.  And women.  He’s accomplished a lot, made it high up the corporate ladder.  So his mind must be capable of seeing the underside of an issue.  Yet it doesn’t.

     It’s a puzzle, this blind spot of his.  When I first had a chance to observe him closely, I figured he was implementing one of those management fads, an extreme manifestation of the Power of Positive Thinking Approach to Life he had picked up from a business bestseller or a motivational speaker at an airport hotel.  Ac-CEN-tuate the positive, e-LIM-inate the negative, and drive your sales through the roof!

     But it’s not that.  After further observations, I’m testing a new hypothesis based on the Subordinate Shun.  It goes like this:

     Like all senior managers, he works through subordinates, setting their performance goals, motivating them to achieve those goals and lowering the boom if they don’t.  And like all subordinates, his subordinates spend their days doing the Subordinate Sandbag, scrambling to come up with all the extrinsic reasons his goals can’t possibly be met, despite the fact that he has the best subordinates in the world working themselves nearly to death to make him look good.  That way if they fail to meet a goal, their Subordinate Sandbag has prepared him for the inevitability of failure – what else can he expect when he sets unattainable goals? – thereby deflecting at least some of the blowback. 

     And if they meet the goal, they’re heroes, having made the impossible possible.

     When you factor in the Subordinate Shuffle, the universal tendency of those below to kick their problems upstairs, and the Subordinate CYA, which needs no explanation, you can begin to appreciate why a manager might develop a healthy skepticism of the negative.  Spend twenty years managing your way around the Subordinate Sandbag, the Subordinate Shuffle and the Subordinate CYA, as he has, and your initial skepticism towards negativity can devolve into full-blown denial, your arsenal of negativity avoidance maneuvers (what I’m calling the Subordinate Shun) filtering out everything you don’t want to hear.

     So like lots of managers practicing the Subordinate Shun, he refuses to accept “no” for an answer.  That’s basic stuff, Subordinate Shun 101.  But unlike any other manager I’ve ever encountered, he refuses to accept “no” for a word.  It simply doesn’t register.  That’s high-level Subordinate Shun.  As a result, in his office never is heard a discouraging word.  “Yes men” are simply called “men.”   

     I think three extra ingredients have propelled him to this extraordinary place. 

     First, he rules his division absolutely, as if by divine right – l’division, c’est  moi.  His unusual autonomy, a product of past performance, failed synergies, language barriers and geographic isolation, almost completely insulates him from corporate oversight.  With his freedom and power he never finds himself in the sniveling subordinate mode, which mode, for all its shortcomings, does have the salutary effect of forcing one to actually analyze both the pros and the cons in order to withstand a grilling from skeptical superiors.  He’s never grilled, so there’s no outside agent to leaven the effects of his Subordinate Shun, allowing his managerial predilection to dismiss the cons to metastasize over the years into complete ignorance of the cons. 

     Second, cocooned in his monarchical reporting structure, surrounded by servile subordinates whose only job is to please him, he’s managed to delegate everything, even delegating, which is handled for him by a cadre of expert delegators.  In addition to delegating every task, they’ve figured out a way to delegate every worry so that nothing need ever furrow his brow, sort of a managerial Botox.  Someday, they’ll figure out a way for him to delegate breathing.  Until they do he can breathe easy, so free from worry that he can forget what it was. 

     Third, he suffers from a particularly virulent case of the Smartest Man in the Room Syndrome, a common affliction of the managerial class.  In its mildest form, this Syndrome manifests itself in a smugly pedantic demeanor, manager as guru, subordinates as eager acolytes.  In its more severe forms, this Syndrome becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, as insecure managers systematically cull anyone with comparable intelligence from the herd, or those with comparable intelligence cull themselves, all too aware that their tendency to think for themselves is, for the Smartest Manager in the Room, the ultimate insubordination.  So each year he gets smarter, if only because those who remain around him get stupider, the smart ones either leaving or learning to act stupid in his presence.  So anything that contradicts his view must be wrong.  And if his view is persistently positive, a bias bolstered by his Subordinate Shun, his absolute authority and his complete insulation from worry, that must mean that any bit of negativity that manages to penetrate his defenses must be wrong, no matter how right it is. 

     It’s amazing what he’s managed to do, creating his own reality, molding his world to his wishes.  I think of him as the Sunny King, always on the sunny side of life, supported by small-minded minions toiling in the shadows on the dark side of his sun. 

     How long can he keep this up?

Post a comment

Numerology

  • Feb 7, 2007
  • Post a comment

   I don’t understand this odd fascination with numbers that end in “0” or “5.”

   Last year, I graduated from college 19 years ago.  No one cared.  This year, I graduated from college 20 years ago.  Now it’s a big deal, there’s a three-day reunion, I get these weekly reminder emails, they’ve started a special fundraising campaign, my phone rings early in the evening with calls from work-study students reading well-crafted scripts developed by the Development Office to drive home the message that my college still needs my money. 

     All because the number of years separating me from college now ends in a “0.”  Woo hoo.

     As I chatted with a representative of the Development Office the other night, I realized there is one number I do find interesting:  200%.

     One of their glossy brochures had a fun list of “20 years ago...” facts and figures.  Back then, tuition and fees were about $10,000.  In 2006 dollars, that’s about $17,700.  This year undergraduate tuition and fees at my alma mater are $34,150, or nearly 200% of what they were back in the mid-1980s.  And don’t forget, college costs doubled after eliminating the effects of inflation. 

     Not everything goes up.  I bought one of the first Apple Macintosh computers soon after I started college.  I spent about $2,500 (about $5,000 in 2006 dollars) for a computer with an 8 Mhz chip, 128 KB of RAM, a 400 KB floppy disk drive and a low resolution monochrome 9 inch monitor. 

     This year I bought one of those new iMacs.  For $2,000 (about $1,000 in 1984 dollars, or only about 40% of what I paid when I was in college), I got a 2Ghz chip (25,000% faster), 1 GB of RAM (781,250% bigger), a 250 GB hard disk drive (62,500,000% bigger) and a high resolution 24 inch monitor capable of displaying millions of colors (immeasurably better).

     So the computer business now provides a vastly superior product for 40% of what it cost when I was in college.  My college provides pretty much the same product for 200% of what it cost when I was in college. 

     Maybe we're not giving enough.  Back when I was in college, the alums gave about $93 million a year, or $164 million in 2006 dollars.  Today, the alums shell out $350 million a year, an after-inflation increase of 210%.  In part because of this increase, since I graduated my college's endowment has increased nearly 400% after accounting for inflation.  And yet the product stays the same, the tuition continues to climb, and they still need my money. 

     My college has a problem.  It’s addicted to cash, a money-addled greedhead for whom no amount is ever enough.  We must feed the beast more more more.  At this point, if I give, I’m just an enabler.  Someone has to break this cycle, and it might as well start with me, so to celebrate my 2oth reunion I think I’ll give nothing. 

     Instead of starving the beast into submission, though, I think I just gave it an excuse to jack up tuition even more.

Post a comment

The Greatest Gift of All

  • Dec 21, 2006
  • Post a comment

I’ve never been much of a gift-giver or receiver.  I’m too self-sufficient to need or want anything, too self-centered to figure out your needs and wants. 

     I know, I know.  Gift-giving is not just about fulfilling material needs or wants, it’s about the joy we derive from the giving itself, which is even better than the joy we get from the receiving.  It’s an ancient practice that reaffirms our familial and social ties, a tangible manifestation of the invisible threads that bind us together.  It’s an essential engine of our economy.

     So gift-giving is a good thing.  I recognize that.  It’s just not for me.

     As a result, I’ve worked assiduously over the years to shrink my holiday gift-giving circle, ruthlessly paring down my gift-giving relationships.   Today my circle is limited to spouse, parents, siblings and one friend who ignores my very clear gift-hating signals and still sends me something every year, obligating me to reciprocate.  Damn him!

     Each year at this time, as they buy presents and check off their lists, rushing to finish their shopping before the annual orgy of obligatory gifting, I imagine them stalling at my name, scratching their heads, wondering:  “What does he want?”  No one knows.

     And I certainly don’t help them.  If they ask me what I want, I tell them:  “Nothing.”  I never drop hints; if I see something I really want, I buy it.  It never occurs to me to ask someone to buy it for me. 

     If they are particularly intrepid, and try to discern my desires through my hobbies, they will be frustrated.  I have no visible hobbies.  I suppose it would help if I collected something, anything, but, alas, I collect nothing.  I am an avid consumer of music and books, but I keep my tastes to myself.  If you want to buy me a book or a CD, good luck.  I have a hard enough time finding books and CDs I like; for you the task is all but impossible.  A classic needle in the haystack situation.

     It doesn’t stop people from trying, bless them, and as a result my shelves and CD racks bulge with the accumulated bloat of years of ill-chosen gifts that I can’t bear to read or listen to, but that I also can’t bear to discard for fear of offending these well-meaning but misguided gifters.

     Don’t you hate having to buy gifts for people like me?

     Years ago I tried to reform and start playing the gift game, but when they asked what I wanted, I honestly couldn’t think of anything.  Just drew a blank.  Still do.  I’d offer up staples I’d have to buy anyways, such as a new coat or socks, or a six-pack of my favorite beer, but they could see through my little dodge.  They knew my heart wasn’t in it.  I tried just making stuff up, but I felt too guilty as they scurried off to spend their hard-earned cash on stuff I didn’t really want. 

     These days they mostly give me gift certificates – Amazon is their current favorite – but the whole thing is very unsatisfying for all involved.  They don’t get to see me eagerly tearing the paper off a box filled with their thoughtfully-selected goods, no, now they’re reduced  to calling and asking if I checked my email.  Or telling me that gift card is good for $50 at Best Buy.  It’s so impersonal, gift-giving reduced to a mere financial transaction.  And I feel so bad when I they need the money more than I do. 

     So why do I persist in frustrating these nice people?   

     Part of it must be attributed to my asocial tendencies.  Gift-giving is a hassle for everyone, but most of us grit our teeth and go through with it because we place such a high value on maintaining our social connections.  I don’t value those connections nearly as much as most, so the hassle of gift-giving simply isn’t worth it for me.

     Similarly, I have a deeply insecure need for privacy, a need so great that it won’t permit me to reveal my deepest desires to anyone, lest they mock me, or to rely on anyone to satisfy those desires, lest they let me down.

     Part of it is because I can afford to buy what I want.  I don’t need you to buy it for me.

     And part of it is because I’ve had this uneasy sense for a long time that, if I’m not careful, my possessions will possess me.  I’m afraid to like them too much.  So I keep them at a wary distance, resisting their attraction, trying to enforce a strictly utilitarian relationship with them.  It doesn’t help when you ply me with bright and shiny things. 

     Slowly but surely, my possession aversion is turning me into a minimalist:  if you avoid new stuff and discard old stuff long enough, one day you’ll end up with nothing.  I’m getting there.  On the way, I’ve discovered the simple joys of throwing things away.  Of cleaning out a closet.  Of emptying drawers.  Of finding 100 pens and deciding that’s 99 too many.  Of figuring out exactly how many shirts I need, and discarding the rest.  Of giving my books away, better to be read by someone else than gathering dust on my shelves. 

     This is how it must feel when a dieter loses weight.  I feel so light and free, it’s liberating!

     So this year, when the few remaining members of my gift-giving circle ask me yet again what I want, instead of saying “nothing,” I’ll say what I want more than anything else in the whole wide world is for them to take something from me.  Preferably something I like, for I’ve probably grown too attached to it for my own good.  So reduce my load, ease my burden, help liberate me.  That is the gift I want. 

     After all, it is better to give than receive, isn’t it?

Post a comment
Outer Life

About Me

Outer Life
View my profile
The History of Today.

Outer Lives

  • Outer Life Main
  • Outer Life Mirror - Blogsome
  • Outer Life Mirror - Blogspot

Archives

  • July 2007 (1)
  • June 2007 (2)
  • May 2007 (1)
  • April 2007 (2)
  • February 2007 (1)
  • 2007 (7)
  • 2006 (1)

Subscribe

  • Subscribe to a feed of these posts
  • Powered by Vox
  • Theme designed by Lilia Ahner
  • Use this theme
  • Home
  • Explore
  • Tour Vox
  • Start a Vox Blog
Already a member? Sign in

Back to top

View Vox in your language: English | Español | Français | 日本語

Brought to you by Six Apart, creators of Movable Type, Vox and TypePad.
Six Apart Services: Blogs | Free Blogs | Content Management | Advertising

Vox © 2003-2008 Six Apart, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Help | Learn More | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | Advertise | Get a Free Vox Blog

Loading…

Adding this item will make it viewable to everyone who has access to the group.

Adding this post, and any items in it, will make it viewable to everyone who has access to the group.

Create a link to a person
Search all of Vox
Your Neighborhood
People on Vox

(Select up to five users maximum)

Vox Login

You've been logged out, please sign in to Vox with your email and password to complete this action.

Email:
Password:
 
Embed a Widget
Widget Title: This is optional
Widget Code: Insert outside code here to share media, slideshows, etc. Get more info
OK Cancel

We allow most HTML/CSS, <object> and <embed> code

Processing...
Processing
Message
Confirm
Error
Remove this member